I am an idiot. There
is no shame in admitting this. In fact,
confessing one’s idiocy is the first step into doing something about it. And I definitely want to do something about
it. I now realise that this is the real
reason for my journey; my philosophy-in-one.
I want to learn how not to be an idiot.
Not being an idiot is not about being smart. Any idiot can know stuff – take me for instance. My history masters course has swelled my head with knowledge; I know so much now that I
did not know before. But with this knowing there is a certain smugness, a
definite ‘Well, don’t-chya-know’ which really isn’t very smart at all. The knowledge that I have (that anyone can
have) is pathetically tiny in comparison to the vast amount to be learned. My back-of-a-fag-packet history gleaned so
far (though worked hard for and thoroughly enjoyed) is really nothing to crow
about. I could memorise the contents of
a hundred-thousand textbooks and still be an avowed idiot.
So you cannot know everything, but can you ever really know ‘truth’
anyway? Well – no, not really. I fancy myself the pursuer of truth, with an
appropriate superhero costume of course, but unlike my bat-shaped muse I shall
never achieve my goal. Truth, I suspect,
is subjective; entirely the possession of the actor and the observer, separate
truths, each with no more validity than the other. This maddening reality is
all the more emphasised when history is your chosen field of study. This is because history is the story of human
endeavour, and how can you ever really know what someone else thought, felt,
hoped and dreamed? I do not understand
myself, let alone other people. ‘Me’ is a shifting, changing thing, somewhat
like observing a landscape from the top of a high hill, where the streaking
rays of the sun reveal features that were utterly hidden before, only to then
be obscured as darkening clouds draw your eyes elsewhere. I am not unique in this - what we are changes
from moment to moment, so being able to ‘know’ all that seems impossible.
So I ask myself, ‘Is history worth it if the truth cannot be
known?’ Well, greater men than me have admitted to how
little they could ever know but still laboured on. It was the Delphic Oracle which revealed to
the world the first non-idiot. It said,
‘Socrates is the wisest’. Socrates
(being Socrates) then set out to prove the Oracle wrong, but in doing so he utterly proved its point. Socrates vox-popped Athens to find men cleverer than he but discovered a common theme to their discussions: namely that the other
person believed they knew the truth of the subject being discussed. Socrates knew this could never be the case. Thus Socrates achieved that tipping-point when being an idiot becomes
being a non-idiot. Though I, like Socrates, am able to admit I am an idiot, this does not
mean that I have achieved his level of self-recognition. He explored the very limits of
human knowledge and what that knowledge actually means. I am a long way off that and I may not even get that far.
There are other reasons for pursuing non-idiocy. Michel Foucault said that, ‘The main interest
in life is to become someone else that you were not in the beginning.’ Well, I do want to change. That is not an admission of self-hatred. I acknowledge the person I am now, the journey
made to get here and I believe I have brought some small benefit to the world
around me. But there are changes to make
nonetheless - though that is a superfluous statement as you cannot stop
yourself changing. That aside, I do
think that my idiocy (which is based on a lack of self-awareness or at
least a mistaken sort of it) manifests in behaviours that make me
unhappy. This journey is not without its
fears and my biggest is that I shall let myself down. By that I mean I shall not work hard enough
on my forthcoming dissertation or whatever else I set my mind to. I have a
habit of doing less than my best, of coasting through things because I
can. But that is not good enough any more. I now enter a world of clever where that kind
of behaviour will not garner the expected results. Also, I disappoint myself when I know I could
do so much more. If I only went that
extra half a mile – imagine all I could achieve?
I also have a tendency to wilfully destroy myself. I get very close to achieving what I set out to do and then drop it over a cliff to see how fast it falls. But when I read philosophy or history I can almost sense the change, the shift inside. For some reason, knowing that some bearded German man in the nineteenth century thought the same things about life that I do, or at least experienced frustrations akin to mine, calms me down. The only difference between him and me is that he writes about it and his writing is eloquent, informed by his reading. Also, I do not sport a beard, though I sometimes think I would like to as stroking one must aid ‘serious thought’. Facial hair aside, I suppose that what I am trying to say is I anchor myself in the past. The tiny idiocy boat I sail upon stops bobbing up and down aimlessly and crashing upon rocks in a storm. Instead it settles so I may stare at my own reflection for a time upon the glassy ocean. I believe the name of my vessel is 'Know Thyself'.
As I age it surprises me how little the people really "In the know" actually know.
ReplyDeleteDon't be hard on yourself. Some (most?) people work their way through life without asking these questions. I do wonder sometimes whether an intelligent and enquiring mind is actually a bit of a curse. As I get older, I suppose I don't try to be intelligent so much. There is a beauty and joy in trying to enjoy the moment rather than be constantly a deep thinker.